Shareholder Agreement Drag Along Clause
While drag along rights are intended to mitigate the effects of minority shareholders, they can be beneficial to minority shareholders. This type of provision requires that the price, conditions and terms of the sale of shares be consistent throughout the territory, which means that small shareholders can achieve favourable selling conditions that might otherwise be inaccessible. It is often debated whether minority shareholders who use their tag right Along should be required to provide the full range of insurance and guarantees that resemble the majority seller shareholder. relative to their existing holdings (unless the agreement gives priority to a specific shareholder or shareholder); and in some cases, drag-along rights may be more popular in agreements with private companies. The drag-along rights of privately held shares may also end when a company goes public with a new share offer. As a general rule, the IPO of stock classes will cancel old ownership agreements and, if necessary, create new drag-along rights for future shareholders. While the drag-along rights themselves can be clearly detailed in an agreement, the distinction between the majority and the minority can be something to watch out for. Companies may have different types of stock categories. A company`s statutes refer to the ownership and voting rights of shareholders, which can affect the majority or minority. Day-long rights are also known as “co-sale sales rights” are the reversal of drag rights along. In the event of the sale of a majority stake by the shareholder (s) who owns a certain majority of the shares, a drag-along right allows the majority seller shareholder to obtain an exit by forcing the remaining minority shareholders to sell their shares on the same terms to a third-party buyer in good faith. The applicability of a legal action depends on its construction in the shareholders` pact.
In the case of William McCausland v Surfing Hardware International Holdings Pty Ltd  NSWSC 902 (Surfing Hardware), a dispute broke out between the majority shareholder and the minority shareholder, which ultimately led the majority shareholders to attempt to oust the minority shareholder by the use clause of the shareholder contract. They did so by one of the majority shareholders, supported by the other majority shareholders, who proposed to buy the entire company and invoked the drag-along clause to expel the minority. As majority shareholders, the practical control of the company is held by these shareholders. Under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), there are certain provisions that are introduced to protect the right of minority shareholders from the repressive actions of majority shareholders in a corporation. Minority shareholders may give private lessons under the law if it can be shown that the company`s transactions were carried out in a manner that was either contrary to the interests of shareholders as a whole, or repressed, unfairly dissociates minority shareholders or unfairly discriminates against them. A deduction allows a majority shareholder of a company to compel the remaining minority shareholders to accept an offer to purchase the entire company.